VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Property Development: Infrastructure

Asked by Chris CoghlanLiberal DemocratMinistry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentTabled Answered 26 February 2025UIN 31226

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of encouraging Community Infrastructure Levy contributions in place of S106 Agreements under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for new developments through upcoming planning reforms.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook

The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is not intended to make individual planning applications acceptable in planning terms.

As a result, some site-specific impact mitigation may still be necessary for a development to be granted planning permission.

Some of these needs may be provided for through the levy but others may not, particularly if they are very local in their impact.

There is still a legitimate role for development specific planning obligations, even where the levy is charged, to enable a local planning authority to be confident that the specific consequences of a particular development can be mitigated.

The government is committed to strengthening the existing system of developer contributions to ensure new developments provide necessary affordable homes and infrastructure. Further details will be set out in due course.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim