VerbatimParliament, as it happens

General Practitioners: Disadvantaged

Asked by Bell Ribeiro-AddyLabourDepartment of Health and Social CareTabled Answered 5 March 2025UIN 33572

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the Carr-Hill formula in allocating funding for GP practices in areas with high levels of deprivation.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock

The Carr-Hill formula aims to ensure that resources are directed to general practices (GPs) based on an estimate of their patient workload. It takes into account many factors under two groups, namely 'drivers of workload' and 'unavoidable costs', including additional needs related to morbidity and mortality, but it does not specifically address deprivation. Plans to review this funding formula may be revisited in future. However, any changes would need careful planning to ensure they do not threaten stability or cause financial uncertainty for GPs.

We are committed to ensuring that primary care medical services receive appropriate support and resources. We recently announced a proposed funding uplift for GPs for 2025/26 of £889 million. This is the largest uplift to GP funding since the beginning of the five-year framework and means a rising share of total National Health Service resources being directed towards GPs.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim