VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Blood Cancer: Medical Treatments

Asked by Neil Duncan-JordanLabourDepartment of Health and Social CareTabled Answered 6 June 2025UIN 55888

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the reasons are for the higher level of NICE Health Technology Assessments of new blood cancer treatments that have been terminated compared to Health Technology Assessments for other forms of cancer treatment.

Answered by Karin Smyth

In the last 10 years, where the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has been able to make a recommendation, 92% of blood cancer treatment recommendations were positive. This is significantly higher than the overall rate for cancer treatments (80%).

NICE has made 97 positive recommendations for blood cancer treatments over the last decade, five times more than in the previous ten years. NICE can only recommend treatments when the evidence shows that they provide benefits for patients and value for money to the taxpayer.

NICE cannot evaluate treatments without information from the companies. If a company withdraws from the evaluation process, the assessment is terminated. For blood cancers, the majority of terminated appraisals were because the company did not provide an evidence submission or the technology was unlikely to be a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim