VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Flats: Repossession Orders

Asked by Bobby DeanLiberal DemocratMinistry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentTabled Answered 16 September 2025UIN 72974

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of an increase in the number of leasehold flat forfeitures due to leaseholders being unable to pay costs arising from building safety defects on the mortgage securitisation market; and if she will make a statement.

Answered by Samantha Dixon

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to Question UIN 30259 on 19 February 2025.

Government remains committed to removing the disproportionate and draconian threat of forfeiture as a means of ensuring compliance with a lease agreement. Qualifying leaseholders are protected from costs of remedying specific historical safety defects under the Building Safety Act, while at the same time we ensure those who built defective buildings take responsibility for remedying them, and wider industry contributes to fixing the problem.

Looking specifically at mortgage securitisation, my officials speak to the mortgage lending sector who we would expect to raise if an issue.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim