VerbatimParliament, as it happens

UK Emissions Trading Scheme: Shipping

Asked by Greg SmithConservativeDepartment for Energy Security and Net ZeroTabled Answered 4 February 2026UIN 109240

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what assessment she has made of whether the administrative costs of extending the UK Emissions Trading Scheme to domestic maritime represent value for money relative to the expected abatement investment, as set out in the Impact Assessment.

Answered by Chris McDonald

The Government’s Impact Assessment explains that the aggregate administrative cost of extending the United Kingdom Emissions Trading Scheme to domestic maritime appears high because including all at berth emissions brings a large number of operators into scope, including those whose activity is predominantly international. The assessment shows that the administrative cost per operator is modest and reflects the need to onboard all operators in the first phase of maritime inclusion. The Net Present Social Value remains positive, and the policy is assessed as value for money.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim