VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Prostate Cancer: Screening

Asked by Sir Julian LewisConservativeDepartment of Health and Social CareTabled Answered 2 March 2026UIN 111606

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether the recent review by the UK National Screening Committee of evidence on prostate cancer screening considered the potential value for money of adopting (a) shorter and (b) simplified MRI protocols, including biparametric MRI, to reduce unit costs of prostate cancer screening in NHS settings.

Answered by Ashley Dalton

The evidence considered by the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) is available in the consultation on their prostate cancer recommendation page at the following link:

https://view-health-screening-recommendations.service.gov.uk/prostate-cancer/

The pathway considered the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as per National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance.

It is important to note that cost effectiveness is only one of the criteria that the UK NSC uses to assess the case for screening. Benefits, harms, acceptability, feasibility, and test characteristics are all important.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim