VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Biofuels and Carbon Capture and Storage

Asked by Sir Oliver DowdenConservativeDepartment for Energy Security and Net ZeroTabled Answered 22 May 2026UIN 249

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if he accepts the finding in Nature Sustainability on 20 April 2026 that bioenergy with carbon capture and storage could (a) increase electricity costs by around 3.5 times and (b) take more than 150 years to create negative emissions.

Answered by Michael Shanks

We do not recognise these claims.

No final decisions around the deployment of large-scale bioenergy with carbon capture and storage projects have been made, and any support would need to provide value for money for taxpayers.

Biomass, including woody biomass sourced from forests, if sourced sustainably, can be considered a low carbon resource. Government only supports the use of biomass in line with our sustainability criteria. To ensure that BECCS delivers genuine negative emissions, detailed biomass sustainability criteria will be developed for BECCS.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim