VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Aviation: Compensation

Asked by Shivani RajaConservativeDepartment for TransportTabled Answered 17 June 2026UIN 6699

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of requiring airlines to cover a passenger's claim management or legal costs in cases where the airline initially rejected a UK261 compensation claim that was subsequently proven to be valid.

Answered by Keir Mather

The Department has not made an assessment of the potential merits of requiring airlines to cover passengers’ claim management or legal costs in these circumstances.

Airlines are already legally required under Regulation (EC) 261/2004 (‘Regulation 261’) to pay compensation where it is due. Where a passenger believes a claim has been wrongly rejected, they can pursue it with the airline and, if unresolved, escalate the complaint to an independent Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) provider (where the airline is a member) or the courts.

Aviation ADR bodies provide a binding decision for consumers at low or no cost, with any fees typically refunded if a complaint is upheld.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim