VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Biometrics: Privacy

Asked by Mr Andrew SnowdenConservativeHome OfficeTabled Answered 16 June 2026UIN 8881

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of live facial recognition technology on privacy rights.

Answered by Sarah Jones

The Police Reform Bill will introduce a new legal framework to underpin law enforcement use of biometrics, facial recognition and similar technologies, making it clear when use of these technologies can be justified, including creation of a single, expert body to provide independent advice and oversight.

In the meantime, there is an established legal basis for use of Live Facial Recognition Technology, which has been tested and confirmed by the Courts, and includes compliance with data protection, equality, and human rights laws. In addition, users of the technology must comply with College of Policing guidance and their own published policies. This means privacy rights are considered in relation to use of live facial recognition technology, which can only be used for a policing purpose, where necessary, proportionate, and fair.

For example, police can use live facial recognition only for targeted, intelligence led, time-bound deployments. During deployments, images of those passing the camera are compared only against a specific watchlist of individuals wanted by police or courts, and images of people who are not a match are immediately deleted.

To inform the new legal framework governing law enforcement use of facial recognition, biometrics and similar technologies, the Government launched a public consultation on 04/12/2025. The consultation explored when and how technologies like live facial recognition should be used and asked the public what factors are relevant to consider when assessing interference with privacy and other rights. The Government response to the consultation will be published in due course.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim