VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Aviation: Alternative Fuels

Asked by Mr Richard HoldenConservativeDepartment for TransportTabled Answered 24 June 2026UIN 11457

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the answer of 15 June 2026 to Question 7033, what assumption on the proportion of Sustainable Aviation Fuel Mandate compliance costs being passed through to passengers was used in the Department's cost-benefit analysis.

Answered by Keir Mather

We recognise the need to protect consumers and factored this into the design of the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Mandate through the inclusion of a buyout option for obligated suppliers, which protects end users (passengers) from excessive costs.

The Sustainable Aviation Fuel Cost Benefit Analysis publication provides an assessment of the ticket price impacts of the SAF Mandate, including a detailed description of the pass-through assumption (Section 3; Annex 7.4). The full cost benefit analysis is available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66601969dc15efdddf1a872d/uk-saf-mandate-final-stage-cost-benefit-analysis.pdf

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim