VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Animal Experiments

Asked by Michael WheelerLabourHome OfficeTabled Answered 6 July 2026UIN 12385

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 3 June 2026 to Question 4646, what assessment she has made of whether the number of Animals in Science Regulation Unit inspectors is sufficient to scrutinise the scientific purpose of proposed studies under service licences alongside their existing workload; and what steps are being taken to ensure that suitable non-animal alternatives are identified and used, including in cases where such alternatives are not reflected in non-technical summaries.

Answered by Sarah Jones

The number of inspectors has recently been increased from an average of 14.5 inspectors in 2023 to 22 in 2026 following an assessment of the resource required for the Animals in Science Regulation Unit to meet its purpose and strengthen the regulatory system. The 3Rs, replacement, reduction and refinement, are a legal requirement under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and must be fully applied in every project involving the use of animals in science. Applicants must demonstrate consideration of the 3Rs before submission, and all applications are assessed by Home Office Inspectors to assure that no practicable non-animal alternatives exist, that animal numbers are minimised, and that methods are refined to reduce suffering. This assessment is supported by continuous scrutiny after a licence is granted. ASRU conducts announced and unannounced audits, reviewing records and practices to monitor the continually application of the 3Rs and that licence conditions remain appropriate. In November 2025, the Government published “Replacing animals in science: a strategy to support the development, validation and uptake of alternative methods”. This strategy includes commitments to improve regulatory confidence and acceptance of alternative methods to animal testing, including plans to establish a UK Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (UKCVAM) to help coordinate validation activity and facilitate engagement between policy makers, regulators, industry end users and alternative method developers. This strategy includes clear time-bound targets for the reduction of animals used in science. In addition, the National Centre for Replacement, Refinement and Reduction is scheduled to provide recommendations to the Home Office to enhance the project licence application form for undertaking research involving animals. This will include advice aimed at strengthening the evaluation of replacement strategies.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim