VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Aviation: Alternative Fuels

Asked by Greg SmithConservativeDepartment for TransportTabled Answered 14 July 2026UIN 16553

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the price of sustainable aviation fuel since the introduction of the UK Sustainable Aviation Fuel Mandate has met the assumptions used in the Department's published impact assessment.

Answered by Keir Mather

The assumptions used in the Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Mandate cost-benefit analysis are projections of future SAF production costs over the appraisal period, rather than observed market prices. These estimates are subject to uncertainty regarding future technology deployment, feedstock availability and market developments. This is covered in detail in the SAF Mandate cost-benefit analysis. At present, hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) fuel is the only SAF pathway with a sufficiently mature and established market from which viable commercial price data are available. Other SAF pathways are not yet deployed at a scale that enables meaningful comparisons against the assumptions used in the cost-benefit analysis. Based on available market data, while SAF prices are inherently volatile and can fluctuate over time in either direction, we are confident that the range of estimates for HEFA SAF in the cost-benefit analysis remains accurate.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim