VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Children: Maintenance

Asked by Andrew GeorgeLiberal DemocratDepartment for Work and PensionsTabled Answered 8 September 2026UIN 19804

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what analysis his Department has undertaken of the reasons why assessed child maintenance liabilities are not paid in full, broken down by (a) deliberate non-payment, (b) affordability concerns, (c) disputed assessments, (d) administrative factors and (e) other reasons.

Answered by Department for Work and Pensions

The Department recently published research which was commissioned as part of the wider evidence base used to inform the Department's review of the child maintenance calculation.

Amongst other things, this looked at the reasons given by both Paying and Receiving Parents as to why they did not pay or receive their full calculated amount of maintenance. These results are discussed in the chapter entitled ‘Insights on liabilities and hypothetical changes’.

These findings are based on the reasons for non-compliance self-reported by a sample of CMS users.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim