VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Artificial Intelligence: Regulation

Asked by Afzal KhanLabourDepartment for Business, Innovation, Science and TradeTabled Answered 7 September 2026UIN 21383

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, with reference to the Answer of 28 April 2026 to Question 128813, which categories of AI system should not be regulated at the point of use; and what assessment he has made of the potential merits of requiring independent safety assessments for those systems.

Answered by Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade

The UK is committed to a context-based regulatory approach that supports adaptability, proportionality and the expertise of our existing sectoral regulators. This is complemented by the work of the AI Security Institute, which deepends our understanding of the critical security risks posed by frontier AI.

The Government is exploring whether additional targeted interventions may be needed in future to address the most significant AI-related national security risks. Any changes would be informed by robust and independent evidence.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim