VerbatimParliament, as it happens

Local Government: Staffordshire

Asked by Adam JogeeLabourMinistry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentTabled Answered 8 September 2026UIN 23751

The question

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if she will make an estimate of the potential savings to the public purse of cancelling proposals for local government reorganisation in a) Newcastle-under-Lyme and b) Staffordshire.

Answered by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

The Government has provided funding to support local government reorganisation, including £7.6 million to support the development of proposals and £63 million in transition funding for councils across the 21 reorganisation areas. As part of the recently announced pause, we will consider council costs and how to support areas through the next stage of the process.

In addition to the non-financial benefits of reorganisation, experience from previous local government reorganisations shows that, while there are upfront implementation costs, unitary councils can be more efficient, reduce duplication and deliver savings over time. For example, North Yorkshire Council has reported around £90 million of savings since its establishment in April 2023.

Verbatim has judged this answer against the question that was actually asked — answered, partly answered, or evaded. Sign in to see the verdict →

Open this question in Verbatim →

Every written question, searchable

155,000 questions tabled since the election, with the answer each department gave — and the ones still unanswered, with the clock running. Free to search.

Search written questions →Read on Verbatim